[MD] MOQ criticism

[Heather Perella]

> > Chris:
> > > In short, he is out there expanding his knowledge
> in Good
> > > old SOM fashion  - 
> > > working for the intellectual level indeed - and
> so how do I
> > > get him to see 
> > > the value in the MOQ?
> > 
> > SA previously:  Of course, we don't think we might be able to
> totally convinced him,
> > but a question might be, does he value science?  And
> why?  That might lead
> > him to give an answer that is more philosophical or at
> the very least,
> > he'll think about value for a moment. 
> 
> (skip)
> 
> Platt: I agree SA.  A good beginning question. Maybe follow
> up with, "Do 
> you value truth?" No matter how he answers, point out
> that he is expressing 
> a value, at the least, that he believe his answer is better
> than the 
> alternatives.   

SA:  Thanks Platt.  I also found the "dismissal" of both Krimel and this science guy Chris is talking about to be undermining their own positions that would like to portray, but find they can't when it comes to application.  In science, all the data is to be considered.  Tests and experiments.  Yet, right off the bat they are dismissing something without following the very method they value as best.  It's a bit strange.


SA