[MD] For Peter

[Ron Kulp]

Peter:

I accept that the most accurate philosophical point to be made about the
wall is that it is an experience.
What do you think would be the first principle or primary axiom of the
MoQ?
Thinking about that is very difficult because straight away the terms I
might use would all come after that first principle.
I think the MoQ must correspond or be able to account for Darwinian
evolution.
The MoQ is anthropocentric in it's effective limitation of Social and
Intellectual realms to people, which I am not happy with.
I think that emotional thinking is the characteristic of the Social
realm
and that should include other animals.
MoQ should be a metaphysical account of how life began as well as how it
develops.

Apologies for skipping from one idea to the other.

Ron:
To posit how life began can be nothing but speculation,
we may observe how life develops, personally the usefulness
of the knowledge of how life began is superfluous to the value
of it's development. I think the MoQ allows for observation
of the value play between levels throughout different species.

What defines the levels differs, dependant on the species observed,
since
we may only know our own with any definitive accuracy, consequently
we may only use our own interpretations as any kind of reference.

To expect MoQ to "be a metaphysical account of how life began as well as
how it develops."
is kinda undercutting what the MoQ is ultimately about.