[MD] Consciousness a la Platt

[Heather Perella]

> > > [Arlo had asked]
> > > Ask yourself, SA, why do you think Platt feels he
> > > must resort to such blatant lies to mask his 
> > > inability to answer these questions?
 
> > > [SA previously previously]
> > > I don't know.
> > > 
> > > [Arlo then said]
> > > I think you're too kind. :-)
> > 
> > SA previously:  I don't know "why" he does it,
> other than to deceive, but deceive
> > limits the discussion.  Maybe he's trying to hide
> something or is in the
> > middle of learning something but doesn't know how
> to explain this transition.?

Platt:
> What "blatant lies" do you think I have
> perpetrated?

SA:  Well, I didn't use "blatant lies".  I said "deceive", but maybe their both mayapples.  I think the point I was making was Arlo asked you questions and you didn't answer them, and those questions are based on your 'evolve', 'need for an origin', and 'intention' comments.  If you say these events happen, but don't provide an answer - without even an 'I don't know' comment, then what are you holding back?  Thus, why I grouped my answer with 'deception', 'hiding', or 'learning something'/'in transition'.
     From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham, with his "consciousness evolves" comment and then his blatant disregard to comment upon this quote of his.  He probably doesn't even know what his own words mean.  It's his track record.  His 'mo'.

windy all day,
SA