[MD] Consciousness a la Platt

[Platt Holden]

> 
> > > SA previously:  Arlo, your correct.  Platt was asked many times,
> > and then tried to
> > > turn the tables on you.  I followed the whole thread. 
> > Platt does go on to
> > > say, "Why don't you (Arlo) answer some of my
> > questions?"  Platt this does
> > > look like lying.
> 
> Platt: 
> > Asking question is lying? How so?
> 
> SA:  You keep saying Arlo is NOT answering your questions, but he has. 
> Your turning to turn the tables on him.  Are we really going to waste our
> time, Platt, beating this dead horse?

Arlo supplied evasions, not answers. If you are going to go that route, 
why not accuse Arlo of lying because he keeps saying Ham isn't answering
his questions. Anyway, where is it written that anyone has to
answer questions, especially when they are thinly disguised accusations?  
Finally, If you want me to stop beating this horse, get off it. 
 
> > > SA:  I find Bo to be even the worse of the worse in
> > this forum.  He's
> > > trying to hijack the moq for himself all together, and
> > even tries to rid
> > > Pirsig from his own philosophy.  Pirsig did all the
> > work, and now Bo wants
> > > it for himself.  I haven't read the Pirsig letter
> > to Bo thread yet, but
> > > looking forward to it.
> 
> Platt: 
> > Again I'm surprised at your personal accusations. 
> 
> SA:  And again, where is the personal accusation?  Don't see it.

Accusing Bo of trying to hijack the MOQ. Not only is it a personal attack 
but implies that your interpretation of the MOQ is the only acceptable one.