[MD] Consciousness a la Platt

[Ron Kulp]

> 
> Ron:
> > What I have difficulty with is that you use our western definition
of
> > intellect as a universal blanket definition of intelligence across
the
> > board. What this does is place our definition of intellect as THE
> > definition
> > of intellect and it places SOLAQI as evolutionarily superior with
you
> > being
> > the pinnacle by virtue of the fact that you are the only one who
> > subscribes.
> 
> Ron:
> Count me in as one who subscribes to SOLAQI as the Intellectual Level
of
> 
> the MOQ, at least in so far as I understand SOLAQI to be. I view all
> levels 
> as defined by what is dominant in them. For me what dominates the 
> Intellectual Level is the S/O division and the assumption of
> determinism.
> 
> Ron:
> Hello Platt,
> Do you agree that the highest social values define intellectual
> patterns?

Ron:
If that means the highest social values are languages, then I agree.
If it means the highest social values are conformity and consensus, then
I 
disagree. Thanks for asking.

Ron:
My main point of asking you this question is that you seem to value
higher social level values, By reducing the intellectual level to
a s/o distinction social excellence is subverted. Intellect goes
the way of the "hippie" movement. I thought you were against 
this sort of thing, that's why it surprises me that you support
SOLAQI.