[MD] Core problemS

[Heather Perella]

Marsha,
    I guess Ron is asking the same thing.  So, I'll read the upcoming posts in my email to catch up to where we presently are in the discussion.

SA


--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:

> From: Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Core problemS
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 5:06 AM
> >
> >Ron:
> >Marsha,
> >what Krimel posted from Lila, contradicts what he wrote
> to Paul turner.
> >
> >His statement :
> >"
> >They are discreet. They have very
> > >little to do with one another. Although each
> higher level is built on
> a
> > >lower one it is not an extension of that lower
> level."
> >
> >conflicts with:
> >
> >" Just as
> > >every biological pattern is also inorganic, but
> not all inorganic
> > >patterns are biological; and just as every social
> level is also
> > >biological, although not all biological patterns
> are social; so every
> > >intellectual pattern is social although not all
> social patterns are
> > >intellectual."
> >
> >Ron:
> >sounds like they have much to do with each other and
> they do extend
> into
> >one another.
> >
> >I'd like to know which it is.
> 
> Ron,
> 
> I don't get the concept of 'continuous' from
> Paul's letter.
> 
> Marsha
> 
> Ron:
> Despite that, they conflict. Drop continuous for now,
> it's superfluous
> to the argument.
> if the levels are separate, distinct and discrete, then the
> statement
> " just as every social level is also
> > >biological" is inconsistent with the term
> discrete
> as separate and distinct.
> 
> If not, please explain how you see those two statements as 
> meaning the same thing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/