[MD] Consciousness a la Platt

Ron Kulp RKulp at ebwalshinc.com
Fri Aug 29 06:31:16 PDT 2008


Hi Platt, hi Ron

27 Aug. Platt wrote:

Ron (to Bo?):
> > > What I have difficulty with is that you use our western definition
> > > of intellect as a universal blanket definition of intelligence
> > > across the board. What this does is place our definition of
> > > intellect as THE definition of intellect and it places SOLAQI as
> > > evolutionarily superior with you being the pinnacle by virtue of
> > > the fact that you are the only one who subscribes.

Bo now:
I have difficulties with Ron's newfangled "universalism". Western 
definition of intellect?? Anyway it looks (to me) as if he accuses 
ME of confusing intellect with intelligence? If so it's upside-down, I 
am the one who claim that this confusion makes the MOQ's 4th. 
level so difficult to sort out.  

Platt commented:
> > Count me in as one who subscribes to SOLAQI as the Intellectual
> > Level of  
> > the MOQ, at least in so far as I understand SOLAQI to be. I view all
> > levels as defined by what is dominant in them. For me what dominates
> > the Intellectual Level is the S/O division and the assumption of
> > determinism.

Ron then asked Platt
> > Do you agree that the highest social values define intellectual
> > patterns?

Bo now:
I guess the relevance is that Ron wonders what social pattern 
gave rise to a S/O intellect.  

Ron wonders:
What color are the skies in your world?

I mean,     holy     



                         fucking      

                                          shit.





















More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list