[MD] Consciousness a la Platt
Ron Kulp
RKulp at ebwalshinc.com
Fri Aug 29 06:31:16 PDT 2008
Hi Platt, hi Ron
27 Aug. Platt wrote:
Ron (to Bo?):
> > > What I have difficulty with is that you use our western definition
> > > of intellect as a universal blanket definition of intelligence
> > > across the board. What this does is place our definition of
> > > intellect as THE definition of intellect and it places SOLAQI as
> > > evolutionarily superior with you being the pinnacle by virtue of
> > > the fact that you are the only one who subscribes.
Bo now:
I have difficulties with Ron's newfangled "universalism". Western
definition of intellect?? Anyway it looks (to me) as if he accuses
ME of confusing intellect with intelligence? If so it's upside-down, I
am the one who claim that this confusion makes the MOQ's 4th.
level so difficult to sort out.
Platt commented:
> > Count me in as one who subscribes to SOLAQI as the Intellectual
> > Level of
> > the MOQ, at least in so far as I understand SOLAQI to be. I view all
> > levels as defined by what is dominant in them. For me what dominates
> > the Intellectual Level is the S/O division and the assumption of
> > determinism.
Ron then asked Platt
> > Do you agree that the highest social values define intellectual
> > patterns?
Bo now:
I guess the relevance is that Ron wonders what social pattern
gave rise to a S/O intellect.
Ron wonders:
What color are the skies in your world?
I mean, holy
fucking
shit.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list