[MD] The levels undressed

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Bo

skutvik at online.no wrote:
> Great acclaim to you for thinking so hard on the MOQ, just a very 
> general comments before starting to read in earnest. Remember 
> Doug Renselle and his inorganic "obsession" and impenetrable 
> diagrams and tables of quantum levels. I believe that all these sub-
> sub-obsession stems from a failure to understand the enormous 
> scope of the MOQ. The inorganic level is just simply the universe 
> (call it physical or whatever) and is made up of - and upheld by 
> inorganic value, it's not "atomic forces" or "chemical forces" that 
> act om matter, this latter inellect (science) peering down on the 
> rest of the static levels. 

Yes, I remember Doug. Not much about that diagram though, so I can't comment on 
a possible connection between my new levels and his diagram. Although I do 
remember his urge to add a quantum level, and I really wish he was around sometimes.

But as many here have told you once or twice, I need more than just you saying 
so to let go of my new levels. We have a *very* different opinion about what a 
level is in the first place and since I have outlined that pretty detailed in 
the essay I suggest you start your criticism there, or anywhere else of course. :)

> BTW, what do you see as the first split? To some it seems to be 
> DQ/MOQ but is supposed to be DQ/SQ no?

DQ/MoQ? I don't follow, do you mean DQ/Reality? But no, of course the first 
split is DQ/SQ.

	Magnus