[MD] The SOM/MOQ discrepancy.
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Thu Dec 4 08:55:13 PST 2008
Hello Arlo,
Not to rush to anyones defence, but....
Due to the fact that biological life is present in the universe, one could argue that
reality is indeed a self reflecting system. What that means or what that entails
I'm not sure I know. But it does seem to be an existing feature.
-Ron
________________________________
From: Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org; moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 11:45:41 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The SOM/MOQ discrepancy.
[Platt to Ham]
Here I see value (Quality) at the very root of your philosophy -- an Essence that created the world because it wanted to be appreciated...
[Arlo]
Exodus 20:5 "You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God..."
I'd say any "Essence" that's so needy that it needed to create "the world" just so its creations will "appreciate it" (perceive its magnificence!?) is a poor "Essence" indeed. But hey, if you need something to worship, I suppose anything will do...
So let me ask... in your views (the need-to-be appreciated Essigod, or the MOQ-based Qualigod), did the "intent to produce man" precede man's existence? That is, in both of your metaphysics, was their a "plan" to make man long before the cosmos appeared?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list