[MD] A fine mess

[Ian Glendinning]

So Bo, ... "gimme a break" you said to Ron, ... as you said to Ian ... etc.
.
I've given you a 3 day break, please address my response discussing
the logic involved (earlier in this thread).

(The dilemma is not with the universality of logic per se, but with
the things the logic is applied to .... how "objective" they are ...
please pick up on this.)

Regards
Ian

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM,  <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Please Ron
> Gif me a braik.
>
> 5 Dec.you wrote:
>
> Bo before:
>> > Yes, Pirsig rightfully thought that (the knowledge of) Quality would
>> > "moderate" reason, but when returning with the MOQ and its levels the
>> > 4th. is as static as the rest and can by no twist of logic be changed
>> > from within but like the rest have a "moderator" above itself - namely
>> > the Quality Metaphysics it is a sub-set of.
>
> Ron:
>> Not by any twist of YOUR logic, true. Alittle logical "truth"  for Bo
>> should he care to read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth
>
> As said to Ian logic is universal, but the premises one starts from
> determine the outcome and I meant by the MOQ premises ... etc.
> BTW what relevance has the Wikipedia article on "truth" for the MOQ
> or its SOL interpretation   .... as you see it.
>
> Bo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>