[MD] A fine mess

[Andre Broersen]

Bodvar to Ron:

Bo before:
Yes, Pirsig rightfully thought that (the knowledge of) Quality would
"moderate" reason, but when returning with the MOQ and its levels the
4th. is as static as the rest and can by no twist of logic be changed
from within but like the rest have a "moderator" above itself - namely
the Quality Metaphysics it is a sub-set of.

Ron:
> Not by any twist of?YOUR logic, true. Alittle logical "truth"? for Bo
> should he care to read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

As said to Ian logic is universal, but the premises one starts from
determine the outcome and I meant by the MOQ premises ... etc.
BTW what relevance has the Wikipedia article on "truth" for the MOQ
or its SOL interpretation   .... as you see it.
Bo

Andre:

Bodvar, as you know, I am still trying to understand your reasoning. I
have a few simple question for you; 1) What do you understand by
'intellect'? ( I have told you that I have difficulty with this 'concept'.
How does it differ from 'intellectual pattern'? 2) Does it 'hold' these
patterns or are these patterns somehow 'outside' of it ít'? and 3) what
makes you think it is 'static'? Do you mean 'static' as immutable?
unchanging? incapable of expanding ??
Please remember that I suggested, for myself, the MoQ as a code of Art
making quality sense and I still feel very comfortable there, and also that
I feel very uncomfortable with the MoQ as an Intell. PoV cosily beside the
SOM as, similar Intell PoV (with their only quarrel being that SOM doesn't
acknowledge Quality) . I mean, you cannot sit beside somebody (SOM) on
friendly terms who completely denies your (MoQ) existence!!

But it still doesn't resolve the intellectual level  'dilemma'.

Kind regards
Andre
PS hope your exhibition has been a success!!