[MD] The inner world

[David M]

Hi Steve

I understand that view but think it is just wrong
because how can we make sense of experiences
without this distinction, we can call it private
versus shared-public toavoid the SOM associations
but the problem with SOM is not the inner/outer 
distinction but the dismissal of subjectivity as less
real. MOQ see inner and outer as both real and
both having SQ and DQ aspects.

DM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Peterson" <stevenkpeterson at mac.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] The inner world


> Hi Joe,
> 
>> IMO Persig would place dq/sq only in this inner world, MOQ, which  
>> is more
>> real than SOM, by including the internal as well as the external.
> 
> I think that the inner/outer split is just SOM. This is just a  
> defense of SOM's "Subject" for materialists who would deny it and say  
> objects are all that is real.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>