[MD] MOQ levels

[MarshaV]

At 03:36 AM 2/12/2008, Magnus wrote:

>Almost. But with the crucial difference that they are not quite
>objective facts. All static patterns are involved in quality
>events, and in a quality event there is always one subject and one
>object. When a rock falls onto another rock, one is subject and the
>other is subject. When an amoeba feels the scent of food, the amoeba
>is likely to be categorized as the subject and the scent is the object.
>But that's just the SOM way of seeing it, the MoQ says that the roles
>can just as well be reversed.
>
>Actually, I haven't thought much about why (and if) we need to keep
>calling the parties in a quality event subject and object, since the
>difference is unclear. They are simply equal parties in the event.

Greetings,

I think about it all the time.  Would it be possible to frame 
discussions centered on the experiential events of patterns of 
value?   Isn't that how you are seeing it?

Marsha







*********
The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only 
the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony 
without end.