[MD] MOQ Levels

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Marsha.

12 February you  wrote:

Chis to Bo:
> > >If anyone can point to some elaborate, abstract thoughts that did
> > >not serve the values of the social level or the biological and were
> > >clearly not a part of a S/O distinction(and was not the MOQ) -
> > >would that prove the SOL invalid?

Marsha:
> Re: Above question?

Bo: I responded before I saw your comments, but as you se I 
interpreted Chris' question as pertaining to the many efforts to 
undermine the SOL by pointing to non-S/O intellectual patterns 
(an oxymoron) most prominently Pirsig's in "Lila's Child" about 
formal logic, mathematics a, computer language. 

> Is it elaborate?

To me the question was clear (elaborated) enough.      

> Does it serve the social or biological levels?

What serves? The question, or?

> Does it represent subject-object distinction?

?? 

> Is it the MOQ?

Too cryptic, you have to elaborate .

Bo