[MD] MOQ Levels

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Ian

ian glendinning wrote:
> Hi Magnus, I share your concerns ...
> 
> You missed my "scare quotes"

Indeed I did. :)

> "life" ... I meant stuff that self-replicates (biological or artificial)
> "genetic information" ... I meant stuff communicated by replication -
> generation to generation (biological or artificial)

It seems we understand each other on this.

> As I said "in my world" quality is kinda equivalent to information ...
> I wasn't suggesting it was the whole story for everyone .... but there
> are some strikng parallels at the bleeding edge of physics.

Are you referring to entangled particles, that are able to convey "spooky action 
at a distance" faster than light? That's what I call *fun*!

They claim it's not possible to use that action to transmit information though, 
but I didn't really understood the reasoning behind that. It sounded more like 
they used relativistic laws to explain a non-relativistic phenomenon, and 
thereby unable to prove anything.

	Magnus