[MD] MOQ Levels
Christoffer Ivarsson
IvarssonChristoffer at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 17 11:29:07 PST 2008
Bo and MOQ talk
> Chris said to Spirit of (SA):
>> What DO you think I am advocating? It is not as if I don't believe in the
>> MOQ! Could you state for me, as simple as possible what you think I am
>> advocating that you presuming don't agree with?
>
> Bo:
> Well put Chris and if it's not the "kiss of death" I'm amazed of your
> grasp of the MOQ ... its SOL interpretation that is, something that is
> necessary for it to be effective .
>
> Chris went on:
>> One thing I can repeat though is the undisputable fact that the MOQ is
>> static (agreed it has the ability to Dynamic Change), and does not
>> provide
>> the ultimate understanding - it just provides a better understanding.
>
> No big thing, but in my opinion the MOQ is neither static nor dynamic,
> rather the Dynamic/Static Reality itself. Admittedly it has a (static)
> level-like aspect vis-?-vis intellect because it's out of it, yet once
> free of
> intellect's S/O tentacles it's neither. To pick one more nit, the MOQ is
> THE "goodness understanding", thus a better understanding than the
> MOQ is hard to imagine, but here we are at the end of our wits.
Granted, such speculations doesn't really get us anywhere, and you are of
course right that it is the Static/Dynamic reality, however, we still have
the S/O tentacles surrounding all of us so it's hard to talk about. That's
where the Value of the SOL lies I think - Sun Tzu: Know your enemy - if we
are to go forward with this we must clearly define what everything is we are
talking about, otherwise the SOM will creep back and get us - so to speak =)
I will attach what I wrote before:
My friend said something like: when everybody is übermenchs (always being
controlled by rationality and the SOM as he stipulated it as) then the 4th
level would be served and supreme, and from this then a "Archangel"
understanding could grow and develop (a Higher Quality interpretation of
things - in effect the Quality interpretation of things) and that would then
go on.
Ha D
Chris
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list