[MD] Patterns

[Ron Kulp]

STEVe,
Just pushing it to an extreme, seeing where SA was coming from.
If an organic form is the vessel in which minerals collect over time,
Does it qualify as a biological rock? The classification considers what
It once was not what it is currently. Just poking around. Exploring
Conceptions of Rocks and minerals.

-Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Steven
Peterson
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:21 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Patterns

Hi Ron, SA,


On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, at 03:20PM, "Heather Perella"
<spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Ron:
>> To conclude that coal is biological by virtue of
>> what it once was would
>> be making The same deduction as stating that it is
>> social wouldn't it?  Or am I missing it. 

I can see how coal suggests participation in biological patterns but not
social patterns. Just because dinosaurs may have lived in groups does
not meam they participated in social patterns. A group of biological
entities is just a group of biological entities not a social entity.

Regards,
Steve
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/