[MD] The End of Faith - Spirituality

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

Craig:

> Bo, Ron, Platt, Arlo, et al.,
> The thread titled "Politics" is also considering the relationship between 
> the terms: 'value', 'quality' & 'moral'.
> I suggest we reserve the term 'moral' for what is not low value/of low 
> quality.
> Craig


We can't rally do that can we. The term moral is so infected with SOM 
thinking that we have a very hard time to get around that. Also the MOQ 
moral hierarchy is confused with social moral codes - codes who, while they 
of course are explainable by the MOQ they are only a fraction of what 
"morals" mean in the MOQ. The moral otherwise beeing talked about is not the 
same thing at all, most of the time quite obviously because it doesn't 
involve humans, but the word is the same, so we have a hard time talking 
about it. I think Arlo has made some good points though. What is "moral" 
within each level is 1) what is high static quality (for molecules to 
cooperate for example) and 2) following dynamic quality. No thinking is 
needed, no decisions needed, nothing. Only Quality.

Chris (says good morning)