[MD] If you find dichotomies immoral

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:

> Platt
> 
> You said
> "description of me as chronically dishonest in no way hides complexity"
> I say - Course it does - as I said I'm happy to use short-hand when
> useful and to the point. You ignored the fact I said that - explicitly
> in this mail.
> 
> You said
> "Gee, I thought you of all people would get a kick out of the article ..."
> I say, of course I may, but as I said and you ignored, I've not read
> it yet. I was responding explicitly to your points, not the article,
> and you as usual, are ignorant of mine.
> 
> You said
> "Yes, and Caesar might not be dead."
> I say, very unlikely, and there is probably good tangible evidence,
> and enormous statistical evidence on the side of that being false.
> Unlike doubtful pregnancy.
> 
> Anyway, thanks for proving my point.
> You are ignorant and dishonest.

"Very unlikely" Caesar might not be dead? Duh. Boy, are you smart! 
 
> Now, where is that arcticle ?

Evidence you pay no attention to what I was talking about. 

Proving you are dumb and getting dumber. 





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/