[MD] thoughts on their own?

[MarshaV]

SA,

Your snow is simply beautiful, and now falls in this part of the woods.

Marsha


At 03:36 PM 2/29/2008, you wrote:
>SA previously:
> > ...Yet, books, CD's, drawings in cave's, and with
>the internet
> > another notch has been raised in how thoughts are on
> > their own.  For one, how can a biological, social
> > human being, with all their thoughts, destroy the
> > thoughts contained in the internet?  The thoughts in
> > the internet show an expansion of freedom in
> > thoughts living on their own.  What do you think?
>
>
> > Ron:
> > I think those things you speak of are artificial
> > Extensions of memory. I don't know SA, I'm leaving
> > myself Open.
>
>SA:  I agree that these 'keepers of thought' are
>extensions of memory.  I guess what instigated this
>thread on my part was to try to explore how thoughts
>are free enough that one can't completely replace the
>concept of thought with the concept 'individual' or
>'human'.  They are not the same, but you did point out
>some posts ago in this thread that self is a kind of
>thought.  So, we do agree on this.  I wouldn't mind
>hearing what Akshay has to say about this as well.
>
>
>snow simply falls...
>     and falls...
>            and falls...
>                   and falls...
>                          and falls...
>                                 and falls...
>                                        and falls...
>                                               and
>falls...
>
>and falls...
>
>      and falls...
>
>             and falls...
>
>                    and falls...
>SA
>
>
> 
>____________________________________________________________________________________



Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...