[MD] Is thoroughly dynamic terrifying?
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Jan 1 12:20:18 PST 2008
Hi DMB
Good point. The quest for security and certainty is of course ultimately
hopeless.
But perhaps something worthwhile can be done, even if fleetingly, is not
fleetingly better than never?
Regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Is thoroughly dynamic terrifying?
David M said:
I wonder how many of us here would say we live in a truly dynamic universe
and that therefore it an extremely dangerous place to be?
dmb says:
I'd say fear is what makes people too static so it does seem that being open
to the dynamic requires some kind of courage. Or maybe its better to say
that dynamism takes more effort, more energy, more wakefulness. I think its
a sad, sad thing to be terrorized by dynamism. One who clings to static
forms out of fear is the victim of some kind of murder. That's a guy who
doesn't own himself and is thoroughly unfree, no?
Plus fear makes people stupid and compliant. Check out Naomi Klein's "The
Shock Doctrine" or Naomi Wolf's "The End of America". Fear is disasterous.
_________________________________________________________________
i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a
difference.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list