[MD] S/O and Morality
Steve Peterson
stevenkpeterson at mac.com
Thu Jan 10 07:46:25 PST 2008
Hi Platt, Jorge,
Platt:
> Pirsig spends some time describing the influence of celebrities
> on society, calling it " ,,, an organizing force of the whole
> social level
> of evolution." (Lila, 20). Because politics is essentially a
> social level
> phenomenon, celebrity influence is to be expected. While scientists
> have
> little public celebrity influence compared to Oprah, they play a
> central
> role behind the scenes in such politically-charged matters as
> economics,
> energy, and national defense. Not so behind-the-scenes is the current
> politics of "global warming" whose advocates constantly refer to
> "scientific consensus" as if that somehow constitutes absolute proof.
Steve:
In the MOQ, the test for truth includes logical coherence and
consistence with experience. In MOQ understanding I don't think
"absolute proof" is ever a reasonable expectation. I also have never
heard anyone say that they have absolute proof of global warming and
I don't see how the immorality of social control over intellect
applies here.
However, I did just hear about such a situation concerning global
warming and the Bush administration's attempts to suppress NASA
scientists from talking about it publically on NPR.
Please see...
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17926941
Would you agree that the Bush administration behaved immorally in
this case according to the MOQ?
Regards,
Steve
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list