[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[squonkmuse at talktalk.net]

Hi Ron,
I think this experiment may have just about run its course and i thank
you for taking it in the spirit it was presented. You make me smile.
I agree with much that you say.

My own view is that the moq poorly states the relationship between DQ
and sq.
I think the term sq needs to be replaced by a spectrum of patterns which
convey their dynamic status.

Cheers Ron,
squonk

Hello Squonk,
I agree, coincidentally I'm in pursuit of this very concept as we speak.
I'm researching how Aristotle used the abstract concrete distinction 
and propose to substitute Dq/Sq in it's stead.
Comprehensively what it would do is provide a context in which DQ/SQ
may operate in. I think sticking to the abstract contextual use of
linguistic descriptors of experience works better than treating them
as concrete particulars which "interact". I think once we move into the
concrete particular reference of the terms we move from MoQ back to SOM.
which consequently falls to the same paradoxes of mind/matter.

-Ron


Hi Ron,
I look forward to reading your ideas when you have them ready.
I quite like Aristotle.
squonk