[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[Heather Perella]

Marsha:
> Sorry, I didn't follow you.  You language sometimes
> confuses me.

SA:  I'm going to blunt - the plains spoken, as if we aren't, to get to what I'm saying for you go on to say something here I don't think has to do with what I posted.


Marsha:
> I thought 
> you were saying people were not talking about personal
> events, but would 
> rather be involved in arguing.

SA:  No and Yes.  I was saying that if this moq-forum is a forum about morals (quality/value, you know), then how best to examine them in these real time events brought up by Squonk, dmb, McWatt, and what have you.  What you might say is arguing is another's debate.  Isn't this philosophy?

Marsha:
> By all means decide who is
> right, and who is 
> wrong, and why?

SA:  I'm not even focused on who's right and who's wrong - at all.  That might happen, but it might snow tomorrow too.  It's about what we do everyday, and now something that is tied into everyday life much more than brains-in-vats and even my abstractions from time to time, arises from the earth and Horse steps in and says stops?  Yes... ?  

Marsha:
> But I'd bet it's about feelings. 
> Anyway, sorry to be so 
> wrong.

SA:  This might be a separation your delineating and others delineate from their daily lives and what happens on this forum.  I say no separation.  Never has been one.  When has anything NOT been about feelings?



SA