[MD] Static Self

[gav]

hi,
so platt thinks nature = biological quality. i disagree. nature is the tao. it is Dq. i think this is self-evident when it comes to taoism.
any others agree/disagree?


--- On Thu, 10/7/08, Platt Holden <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Platt Holden <plattholden at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Static Self
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Received: Thursday, 10 July, 2008, 12:52 AM
> > [Platt to Gav]
> > Your "new mode of existence" sounds
> suspiciously like the Hippie commune  mode
> > of the 60's. No need to repeat Pirsig's
> explanation of why it failed.
> > 
> > [Arlo]
> > What part of what Gav said was "mistaking
> biological for Dynamic Quality"?
> > That's why Pirsig said the hippie movement, a
> MORAL movement, failed
> > ultimately. But apart from that confusion (biological
> with Dynamic) it was the
> > moral direction we should have gone. Now... what part
> of what Gav said repeats
> > that mistake?
> 
> [Platt]
> I assume you've read Gav's paean to Pantheism, the
> philosophy rooted in the 
> glories of the biological level. Seems that's where Gav
> finds DQ in 
> abundance.  If I'm wrong, I look forward to Gav
> correcting me. 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


      Start at the new Yahoo!7 for a better online experience. www.yahoo7.com.au