[MD] Static Self

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

[Ian]
> Happy to join in the "Nature of Intellectual" thread (should really)
> ,,, but this is not the place for debates about "isms" .... capital or
> social ... people end up having social level debates about what should
> be intellectual level issues.

> You could say "isms" are social level patterns to most people.

Quite right I'd say. And it is frightening how easily people slips into 
social-value bashing  when one tries to keep a logical, intellectual level 
based discussion. I'm sure I've done it once or twice myself, but I am very 
careful not to do so when debating key issues regarding politics.

Anyway,  I welcome your input on the nature of the intellectual level and 
the "Knowledge for knowledge's sake" idea

Regards
Christoffer