[MD] Intellectual isms

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

> [Craig:]
> But money isn't just a measure of SOCIAL quality. Pure gold is more
> valuable than adulterated gold; a thoroughbred horse is more valuable
> than a nag; a well reasoned book is more valuable than a
> scatter-brained one. Money is social, but what it measures need not be.
> Craig

-_- Where did that rabbit come from? Money is social level value ascribed to 
things. That's it. So when you talk about something having value as in being 
worth money you are talking about what social value it has. Weather that 
thing has biological or intellectual value really doesn't matter if the main 
form of measurement is a social one - I.e how much money it is worth.