[MD] The Intellectual Gauntlet
gav
gav_gc at yahoo.com.au
Fri Jul 18 04:09:38 PDT 2008
dear marsha, mati and anyone else,
maybe this is mutually agreeable...?
thinking is activity - experience, ie undivided.
the subject and object are abstracted from experience, along with all other intellectual patterns.
subject and object are a bit like time and space i think...it *seems* obvious that they have an independent existence - fundamental, bedrock of reality, constant....but we know that even time and space have no independent existence. all maya.
what is the intellectual level about? fundamentally it is the *activity* of the intellect, its dynamic aspect. no SOM here, just thinking. thought and thinker are abstracted after the fact.
but for what *purpose*? isn't that they key question? (...for an investigation into values/morals). and the purpose must be quality...good ideas. another way of saying 'truth'.
but this is not an absolute truth...that is the ideologisation of truth, which is a social value. absolute truth means collective truth.
no. the truth that beckons the individual is existential truth - what is true (good) for them. it is the examined life leading to the life worth living. this is the purpose and measure of intellect.
so the individual *chooses* which social patterns are good for them. the intellect chooses those social patterns which support it best - this is moral. when social patterns try to do this to intellectual patterns it is immoral.
-----
what does the intellectual level contain?
intellectual static patterns of value, one of which is SOM.
Start at the new Yahoo!7 for a better online experience. www.yahoo7.com.au
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list