[MD] The Intellectual Gauntlet

[Ian Glendinning]

He hee.

I didn't expect it to be "easy" to believe - as I said "I'm serious"
And when did "saving face' come into it ?

Your rhetoric concerning me, is not exactly providing convincing
arguments concerning the subject matter. Which is a pity.
Ian

On 7/22/08, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ian said:
> At the risk of winding DMB up further, but I'm serious, I think the idea of "rigorous" argument is part of the Giant - one reason I personally prefer conceptual slipping - lateral thinking of sorts - and joining up dots not otherwise connected in logical, causal ways. Traditional "rigour" grasps for those concrete meanings.
>
> dmb replied:
> Right. You're not a clueless, drivel-spewing weasel. You're just trying to be free of the Giant. Yea, that ought to save face. And you can be certain that people will believe it In fact,  that's gotta be one of the most believable things I ever heard.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger.
> http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger2_072008
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>