[MD] Social Level- Catholic Social Teaching
Platt Holden
plattholden at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 08:17:57 PDT 2008
Hi Bo:
You wrote:
> Hello Stephen, pleased to meet you if we haven't spoken earlier.
>
> I'm from the original Lila Squad times and am reeling from more
> than ten years of fighting for the MOQ, yet seeing it deteriorating
> every day and is why I just had a fleeting glance ate the Catholic
> page you referred to on 27 July: it's about as far from the MOQ's
> social LEVEL as possible.
Yes, indeed.
> > I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how one group of
> > people (Catholics) look at social level values. Is there any parallel
> > to social values we usually discuss? What are the overarching
> > intellectual values/ideals driving these social teachings?
>
> The real Q-social level's purpose was (still is) a dynamic revolt
> against biological value of merely eating and proliferating, thus
> social value was/is about checking this "jungle" existence and what
> fulfills this purpose is a greater reality that transcends biological
> life. Thus the proclaimed catholic human rights is about the least
> Q-social value there is, they are all about the individual's
> submission to the greater reality (religion most often, but can be
> called "the common cause").
Also called "the public good," or "the public interest," described in the
MOQ as submission to the Giant.
> However, because intellectual value is the same revolt regarding
> social value one of its its value aspects turns round human worth
> and rights ... and THIS is what has reformed the original "raw"
> social patterns to the present mellow "teachings" . The catholics
> may believe that the individual's preservation is their agenda, but
> the Semitic type religion are Q-social patterns and everything turns
> round existence beyond, their least concern is Q-intellectual
> welfare.
Right.
> I won't pull the whole cultural history, but Christendom is
> ambiguous with one leg in the Semitic, Q-social tradition the other
> in the modern, intellectual one, Catholicism representing the
> former, while Lutheranism represents the latter. Excuse my
> grumpy style, but I'm aghast of how this discussion has mangled
> the MOQ.
"Mangled" is putting it mildly.
Best,
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list