[MD] Truth and the Linguistic Turn

[Ron Kulp]

> Marsha:

I would like to see better where Buddhism and the MOQ agree.  They both 
agree there is no SELF.  I see patterns as conventional entitites.  I
don't 
think that DQ relates to emptiness.  Static patterns of value are empty
and 
are totally the product of conceptual thought.  The four levels are the 
product of conceptual thought.  The MOQ is a product of conceptual
thought. 
Empty.  Empty.  Empty.  Empty.   I don't think the net-of-jewels model
fits 
into the MOQ.   This bother me.

Ron:

Hello Marsha,
If the model fits your MoQ, there is no problem. The universals, as I
see
Them are keeping the mind open to change and open to a constant
evolution
Of your modes of understanding. Experience is a creative act like
painting.

I feel the MoQ is a radical metaphysic. If the net of jewels model
Works and best explains your relation for you then who is anyone to
Say you are wrong?

Unless you were already expressing this, then I digress.