[MD] Chance
Krimel
Krimel at Krimel.com
Sat Jun 14 11:25:02 PDT 2008
[Ham]
I don't see it this way. Appearances are experienced dimensionally (because
of man's space/time mode of awareness), and we call the whole procress
"existence". That events are experienced in sequence and distributed in
space is a function of organic sensibility. We intellectualize this
perspective as the knowledge of our reality. But even the physicists have
determined that the critical density (mass) of interstellar space equates to
less than one hydrogen atom per cubic meter, which means that physical
existence is almost entirely a void -- empty space, nothingness.
[Krimel]
Once more time with feeling: empty space IS empty space. It is that which is
not-other than empty space. Empty space IS NOT nothing. Empty space IS not
not-other than nothing.
Within the spatial void ex nihilo nihil fit happens all the time
spontaneously. The Big Bang can easily be conceived as an uncaused first
cause that is neither absolute nor undifferentiated. It is the instant of
the birth of spacetime. While the Big Bang is a "theory." It is supported by
lots of evidence. It does accord with the universe as it is currently
understood. It does make verifiable predications about future states. It
serves all of the functions of your "Essence" without the quasi-religious
overtones.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list