[MD] Chance

[Ham Priday]

Ron --


> Ham:
> I respect your aim and your concepts, I just hope
> You understand that I am not attacking you just exploring
> the finer aspects of difference.

[Ham, previously]:
> IMO, SOMETHING is needed to provide the MoQ with a
> metaphysical foundation.

[Ron]:
> Perhaps this is something we can work on together.

Quite possibly.

> Maybe I have a similar theory that I am so comfortable with that
> It's something that's a non-issue for me that it might be
> for others.  Perhaps I have a blind spot in this regard.

Ron, I'd like very much to hear your theory.  The more I know about where 
you're coming from, the better I can phrase my concepts in a way you will 
understand.

Incidentally, may I offer a suggestion concerning your e-mail fomat which 
may be troubling other respondents?  I don't mean to nit-pick, as I'm guilty 
of careless typos myself, but it is not necessary that you begin each line 
with a capital letter.  You need to capitalize only when it is the first 
word of a sentence, not the beginning of every line of type. (That will make 
it easier to read and copy your previous posts )

I've asked before that you give me a synopsis of your personal worldview, 
but your response has been to reinvent Pirsig.  I would suggest that we 
express our concepts freely, in our own terms, and then apply them to the 
MoQ scheme as appropriate.  In that way, we may even be doing RMP a favor!

I've been spouting Essentialism in the last few posts.  Why don't you start 
the ball rolling for a fresh start?

I appreciate your continued interest in my ideas, Ron, and look forward to 
hearing yours.

--Ham