[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

> squonk:
> I take the view that a Carbon atom experiences DQ as a mystical experience 
> which is in its >own way comparable to that?experienced by people: Lila 
> explores how it is that we >experience DQ differently, DQ doesn't evolve 
> (DQ simply is, one can't have more or less of >it) it is the static 
> filters?which evolve, so they can experience DQ with different 
> (increasing) >intensity.
> A Carbon atom is a static structure which experiences DQ in its own way - 
> it is its own >filter for DQ.
>
> As such, it may be possible to rank DQ events as experienced by static 
> filters because it >could be argued that more evolved filters experience 
> DQ more intensly.

[Chris]
I must say I wholeheartedly agree with this! And so it naturally follows 
that the theoretical übermench is one that is more evolved in the aspect of 
being able to see more pure Quality (DQ) and are not tied down by the static 
patterns as much.


Regards

Chris