[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[Heather Perella]

dmb to Squonk:
> Maintaining the pre-linguistic state of infants won't
> produce mystics. That would be a matter of disrupting the
> normal developmental process and it would only produce
> retarded child. 


     Squonk, you mentioned infants theoretically may not need parents anymore.  Did you miss the point I was making about infants that are not touched?
     Contact, touch, interconnectedness, these are intertwined snugly.  I see this vat getting in the way, towards a 'retardation', maybe of infants if your "theoretical" experiment would take hold.
     I'll post a reply to your direct post to me, Squonk, this happened to jump out at me while I was catching up on this thread.  


finally made it camping after the third try this year,
no concussion this time,
SA