[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[squonkmuse at talktalk.net]

Hi SA,
I?agree with you in this.
That's the way i've always seen it, but i am prepared to rethink the matter if provided with a good argument.
squonk

Squonk, Chris, and others,

???? I find what you said here Squonk comes close, if not the same or part of 
what I'm trying to communicate when I say: 

???? a rock is an analogy of dq

woods,
SA

> > squonk:
> > I take the view that a Carbon atom experiences DQ as a
> mystical experience 
> > which is in its >own way comparable to
> that?experienced by people: Lila 
> > explores how it is that we >experience DQ
> differently, DQ doesn't evolve 
> > (DQ simply is, one can't have more or less of
> >it) it is the static 
> > filters?which evolve, so they can experience DQ with
> different 
> > (increasing) >intensity.
> > A Carbon atom is a static structure which experiences
> DQ in its own way - 
> > it is its own >filter for DQ.
> > As such, it may be possible to rank DQ events as
> experienced by static 
> > filters because it >could be argued that more
> evolved filters experience 
> > DQ more intensly.