[MD] Zen

[Heather Perella]

> [Chris]
> Mh. o/o doesn't affect other patterns, just the way
> we look upon them. And 
> all of the world. But I'm trying to come to grips
> with what you think is 
> wrong with this. You and others. So far I have got:
> "We think Bodvar is 
> pompous" and "fluffy stuff doesn't qualify into the
> intellectual level" is 
> there anything else? I am sincerely wondering.


SA:  First, Bodvar is pompous.  Bo said in a post not
too long ago, which he does state from time to time,
this as follows:


[MD] What is metaphysics to you?
Fri Feb 29 02:55:50 PST 2008
     "...but add all from the list above -  Pirsig too
- because all 
who believe that the MOQ is a mere theory ABOUT
Quality aren't  
true Quality Metaphysicians." 


SA continues:  Bo doesn't understand where we're
coming from, no matter how many times we try to
explain to him, he's caught up in what, I believe, he
believes, is his prize, award winning SOL.  And the
SOL must live on.  I don't know anybody that thinks on
the forum, that the moq is ONLY a "mere theory", but
I've repeated this to Bo many times, but again, he's
the ONLY "true Quality Metaphysician".
      What I don't like about the SOL is its'
exclusivity of the intellect to s and o's only.  The
reasoning that the world is EITHER this OR that.  Bo
states s/o is SEPARATE.  I don't think s's and o's are
separate but they are intertwined.  


short answer, gotta go,
SA


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ