[MD] Zen

pholden at davtv.com pholden at davtv.com
Sat Mar 8 07:15:43 PST 2008


Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:

> Hi Platt, et al,
> 
> I noticed you make a similar comment just a few posts ago ...
> As you might guess I like that meta-intellect idea, I made some
> comments before about MoQ as a meta-metaphysics, and some discussion
> of meta concepts generally, but I'd not seen the meta-intellect idea
> expressed before. Interesting.
> 
> Might break this deadlock with seeing the 4th layer as SOMist
> intellect only, if we have the MoQ itself as a meta-intellect.
> Something to think about. Thanks for that.
> 
> Ian

Thanks, Ian. I may have stolen "meta-intellect" from Bo. At least he speaks
of a meta-level from which we see the validity of the MOQ. Your "meta-concepts"
fit right in. I think this is the direction we have to go if we are to move
the MOQ off dead center. I would appreciate any thoughts you have about this.

Platt
 



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list