[MD] Zen
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Wed Mar 12 09:29:15 PDT 2008
[Platt]
Arlo flatly contradicts Pirsig. About those two biological
individuals -- according to Arlo they both started talking simultaneously.
No matter how Arlo tries to justify a communitarian agenda, "Someone
has to be first."
[Arlo]
Arlo does not contradict Pirsig, he simply takes all of Pirsig into
account, and he certainly does not use one one-liner to disprove
other things the man said. As for your "one lone man who just started
talking", I don't know how much more ridiculous you can get (but I'm
sure you'll find a way to top it eventually).
Yes, they did in that moment of recognition of shared attention both
start talking simultaneously, as they negotiated rudimentary symbols
for the experience they were sharing. And in that moment, culture and
selves were born. And this event was made possible by the long chain
of evolution that set in place the neurobiological affordances and
constraints upon which the recognition of the shared event, and the
storage of symbolic representae was made possible.
But, it makes soooo much more sense that there was this one lone man,
who just decided to invent language, and then went out and taught it
to others. Nevermind that if he had no language prior to inventing
language, how'd he do it? No, you can stick with your I-B-I MOQ all
you want, I'll take Pirsig's I-B-S-I.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list