[MD] The Beginning of it All
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Sun Mar 16 08:51:16 PDT 2008
Hi Ktim
see comments
DM
>> [Krimel]
>> I don't see how consciousness can come before unconsciousness and I would
>> never equate DQ or SQ with either.
>
> DM: Well until you can make this imaginative leap you're gonna be missing
> my point. Frankly, why not?
>
> [Krimel]
> First, because it makes more sense to me to speak of the unconscious
> evolving toward consciousness, than to talk about consciousness falling
> asleep. (Lila game notwithstanding) As to the second part, because
> consciousness is neither; it is a combination of both.
DM: My point, to use your language, is that inorganic patterns are neither
all SQ or DQ
but a combination of both, hence there is no great divide with organic
patterns,
if you say there are aspects to human beings that rocks don't have like
language
who would disagree but after you list such things have you listed everything
we
mean by consciousness and does that leave anything in common with rocks?
This is an extreme point about what we do and do not know I admit but
without
this admission we may fail to see how life & consciousness is possible for
inorganic patterns
as it clearly is when brought into certain patterns that realise new
possibilities.
>
>
> [Krimel]
> Hamish is a very useful language if your intent is to sound like an expert
> without the need to actually say anything meaningful.
DM: This is his sin, but he does not always commit it.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list