[MD] A universe fit for man

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Arlo previously]
At some instance in the past, "man" spontaneously came into being in
more-or-less the form he is today. At this moment, man's consciousness
"created" the universe.

If we can forgo (for the moment) the details, would you say that this is
more-or-less correct?  If not, can you correct it and provide me with a
similarly short and succinct synopsis of your ideas on this?

[Ham]
"Spontaneously" implies independently or unconditionally, and you must
understand that I consider existence both conditional and relational.

[Arlo]
What would you say instead? 

[Ham]
I let the anthropologists decide how Homo sapiens evolved as a distinct
species, and to what extent early man differed from modern man.  It isn't my
expertise or purpose to quarrel with evolutionist theory.

[Arlo]
I would think this is a critical component of your thesis, Ham. If "man"
existed in some "no man" form first, what was the purpose? Because this implies
"existence" and "no man" co-occurring. So if the universe did not exist before
man, man simply could not have evolved, and must have appeared "fully formed".
No?

You've repeated your thesis at moderate length, but I am wondering if you could
give me a short version, like I've started with above, that would explain this
to me. Or is that something you'd say would be impossible?