[MD] Sickness and Death
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu May 8 00:12:34 PDT 2008
At 12:25 AM 5/8/2008, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>I'm with you, Chris. Much (not all) of what is called
>medical/medicine is a Capitalistic hoax, and the media is fully
>participating in perpetrating that hoax. I'll trust the medical
>establishment when it's primary function is prevention and healing
>rather than PROFIT.
>
>[Krimel]
>The problem is that most of the people receiving treatment for serious and
>long term mental illness are not served in the for profit system. Most are
>without means and are unable to hold jobs long enough to receive insurance
>benefits. They are more likely to be indigent and or relying on Medicaid to
>pay for treatment. Many receive minimal stipends through Social Security
>disability.
>
>This is a complex issue and one that has along history. Even in the 1700s
>there were periods of enlightened treatment and periods of merely
>warehousing the mentally ill. Today partly because of the public expense of
>mental hospitals, partly as a result of successful medications and partly as
>a result of groups concerned with the civil rights of the mentally ill,
>facilities all over the country have closed their doors. It is now estimated
>at of the 700,000 homeless people in this country every day, some 30% are
>mentally ill.
>
Greetings Krimel,
Why yes, when people are getting screwed it's always a "complex
issue". Frontline had on a couple weeks ago a program: The Medicated Child.
http://www.mindfreedom.org/kb/youth-mental-health/pbs-on-psychiatric-drugging-youth
But my complaint was about the medical establishment in
general. Surgery as a doctor's first line of defense against
inflation. And the pharmaceutical establishment is a perfect example
a "complex issue".
http://www.naturalnews.com/021526.html
http://hypocrisytoday.com/drugs.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=950DE3D61F3DF935A25757C0A96F948260
First they scare you and then they take your money. They act as if
you should never die. But I also saw this happen up close. When my
husband was diagnosed with cancer (Melanoma), they had found 3 tumors
on his spine, a tumor in his liver, tumors, in his spleen, a tumor in
his lungs and a tumor in his adrenal gland. This was December
1995. Of course then recommended an aggressive radiation and chemo
program. After the first radiation series there was no change in the
tumors, so they gave him an initial hormone treatment to start the
chemo program. It blew a hole in his stomach and he was in Intensive
Care for 10 days. On the 11th day they started the chemo. When the
first round of chemo didn't work, they put him through the radiation
program again. He was now some 95 pounds. When that didn't work,
the doctors suggested and started a second round of chemo. You see he
had a very good Insurance Plan, and this was a new Oncology Unit.
When I questioned their strategy, the doctor told me not to take away
his "hope". After the first day of the second round of chemo, he
said enough, and we called Hospice.
There is no doubt in my mind, it was about the money. I knew, as did
the doctors, from the first day he was diagnosed with so many tumors
in so many organs, that he was a goner. I won't describe the
tortuous side-effects he endured, but they were unnecessary. - I
rely on common sense, not drugs or doctors. And I fully accept death
as a part of life. You can justify any which way, but I don't trust
the medical establishment. I am mightily suspicious of their
'enlightened procedures' when it's the bottom line that counts.
Marsha
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list