[MD] Academy

[Ron Kulp]

Ian,
I think using the chataqua model is the best method, Colorado
Seems to be heading in the right direction, check it out:
http://www.chautauqua.com/programming_tfandf.htm
if anything the more industrious of us should contribute
and participate. If it is still around in another year or so
I'd like to attend and maybe write a paper or two.

-Ron





Bo, Ron,

I guess the simply answer is that we set the personal example by not
talking in those either / or nature / nurture terms - not labelling
those lost souls in terms of being members of camps.

We apply the metaphysic personally as Ron says.

What we don't do is start a confrontation with people in two camps
(neither of which we like); try to point out they are wrong, and try
to educate them in MoQ.

We take MoQ thinking to both camps and help them solve their problems
- personally. In doing so they will learn - personally.
Ian

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:
>
> Ron:
> I think a Quality academy should be dedicated to the endeavor
> Of developing a personal Quality Metaphysic. Not
> Teaching "The Metaphysics of Quality". If we truly
> Understand MOQ, we would understand that the development
> Of personal Quality involves the development of the body
> As well as the mind since they are undeniably inter-woven
> And their condition certainly influence one another.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/