[MD] WHY MoQ IS PARALYzED

[Heather Perella]

Ron,

     I'm contemplating this.  I'll get back to this
post.


SA
--- Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:

> 
> SA:  I agree with what your saying Ron.  I like the
> points your making.  I find your angle on this
> helpful.  If you came up with a list of hang-ups on
> this forum currently, ones founded on misconceptions
> and not intentional ignorance that motives certain
> old
> tea swishers, it would be helpful too.
> 
> Ron;
> 
> One common misconception is to view SQ/DQ in S/O
> terms.
> Giving rise to the perception that they are separate
> entities
> Ie. DQ acting upon SQ, or DQ animating, driving or
> empowering SQ.
> Rather than an alteration in the rules that define
> experience.
> 
> Two, is viewing the 4 levels in the same way, so
> they are perceived
> As separate levels in struggle rather than active
> distinctions of
> An active whole. (this ties in with the above
> misconception)
> 
> Third is seeing better-ness as an entity rather than
> a function.
> Better-ness is aligning ourselves with Quality.
> Since the term
> "Quality" means Reality we focus on pre-intellectual
> awareness.
> Leaving "better-ness" undefined. Therefore reality
> is the standard
> for MoQ morality and its base in certainty.
> 
> There's three good ones for starters.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ