[MD] Academy

[Heather Perella]

Thanks Joe.

I don't know if that's what Bo means or not.  I may
not detail the explanation the way you do.  In other
words, your style differs from my style, which is all
good.  I do see you've been able to incorporate
quality into your life instead of reaching for it
somewhere 'out there' while pushing some ghostly
'camps' away.  Thinking is still a quality event. 
Washing dishes is still a quality event.  

thanks.

bird singing at night,
SA



> SA:  Bo, this is what I mean.  Where up above do you
> say what dq/sq split is, other than an axiom?  This
> is
> the same as saying lapodocoldieameida is reality. 
> I'm
> not trying to be harsh, but if you can't say what
> dq/sq split is, then lapodocoldieameida might be
> better instead. Don't you think?  Is your reality
> complete mu, complete denial of everything, such as
> Jainism?  If these comments are true, then your
> reality is truly personal, thus, something I
> wouldn't
> know about only you would.  Is that your intent?
>  
> Hi SA, Bo and all,
> 
> I realize this is addressed to Bo, but I want to add
> my two cents to ³a
> statement accepted as true without proof or
> argument². IMO Dq/sq is a simple
> division.  DQ is undefined and SQ is defined
> reality.  Put that statement
> into history.  DQ in metaphysics is the Conscious
> only experience of an
> individual.  It differs from the subjective
> experience of SOM, which
> proposes an abstracted essence given intentional
> existence in a mind.  DQ is
> a real, undefined, conscious experience of
> existence.  SQ can be described
> as a Conscious/Mechanical experience. The Conscious
> element in SQ experience
> is embodied in ³analogy², metaphor, or gesture. The
> Mechanical element is
> defined mathematically.  Another way of looking at
> it, DQ is an order in
> existence and is a law unto itself.  SQ is a
> Manifestation in existence,
> requiring three aspects for intelligibility, what it
> is, what it isn¹t, what
> supports it (DQ). Evolution is an acknowledgement of
> the duality DQ/SQ.
> Metaphysics is DQ/SQ. This is how I understand how
> Bo envisions a MOQ
> meta-level of metaphysics ³an axiom accepted as true
> without proof or
> argument².
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 5/9/08 1:00 PM, "Heather Perella"
> <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > SA:  Bo, this is what I mean.  Where up above do
> you
> > say what dq/sq split is, other than an axiom? 
> This is
> > the same as saying lapodocoldieameida is reality. 
> I'm
> > not trying to be harsh, but if you can't say what
> > dq/sq split is, then lapodocoldieameida might be
> > better instead.  Don't you think?  Is your reality
> > complete mu, complete denial of everything, such
> as
> > Jainism?  If these comments are true, then your
> > reality is truly personal, thus, something I
> wouldn't
> > know about only you would.  Is that your intent?
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ