[MD] Academy

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Ian 

Sun May 11 You wrote 

> Interesting change of tone there Bo ?
 
> But if all you are saying is that any metaphysics has an axiomatic
> unprovable-assertion / inexplicable-entity at its core - then "Hear,
> hear."
 
> Do you think Ron and/or SA are missing that ?

What you and Ron are missing I don't know, but the Sprit at least must 
have slept through all classes from kindergarten onwards. Accusing 
me of the DQ/SQ being an axiomatic assertion as if THAT is a 
sensation. I'm still reeling from her show of ignorance. 

Is this cryptic style to be understood that you too found that 
sensational or something you knew all the time, no need to be coy Roy 
I also asked you how you see the MOQ resolving the nature/nurture 
paradox, haven't heard a word from you about it so you (too) obviously 
don't know how the MOQ is applied .  

Bo