[MD] Correctness and Usefulness

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:

> OK Platt, only one minor "correction" from my side
> 
> > The limits of logic, language and observation at the quantum level are
> [what Platt defines as]
> > fundamental Truths.
> [with a capital T]
> 
> All I would say, is that they are not all that fundamental if those
> limits are themseves evolving - which they are, so I still don't
> understand why these are privelidged to get the capital T. They are
> just the current known limits, are they not ? Like what's so special
> about "the quantum level" - is that the last word in physics as far as
> you are concerned ?

You know of lower level? 

> Without re-stating again examples of WHICH truths are Truth, I'm
> asking a defintional question as to WHAT makes them fundamental [to
> you] ?

I have explained at at least three times. If you don't agree, so be it. 
I ask you, is "They are just the current know limits" a fundamental Truth?







-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/