[MD] Patterns

[Joseph Maurer]

On Monday 12 May 2008 9:25 AM Ron writes to all:

Greetings All!
 
[Ron]
Been thinking about patterns.  I have two questions for you:
 
[Ron] 
1.  Do you know of anything, either conceptual or physical, that is
not a pattern?

[Ron] 
2.  What is a pattern?
 
 
[Ron]:
If you do not mind my answering you inquiry, I will attempt to follow
Pirsigs logic.

[Ron] 
Patterns are experience. Patterns are Quality.

[Ron] 
Experience is expressed intellectually per MoQ,
As static experience or "SQ" and dynamic experience
Or "DQ".

[Ron] 
By understanding that this split is intellectual MoQ
Solves the Mind/Matter paradox it does not exist
In experience, it only exists intellectually.

[Ron] 
By placing empirical certainty on pre-intellectual
Experience, MoQ is more certain than objectivism
Which places certainty in intellectualism.

[Ron] 
By using DQ/SQ in lieu of S/O we are able to
View reality as a whole in motion rather than
A static solid state universe of objects in
Space. (Hams negation and Bo's folly).
 

Hi Ron and All,

[Joe]
What is evolution? Pirsig¹s logic accepts evolution! Does the inorganic by
not knowing what evolution is not evolve?  Is DQ another name for evolution?
SOM divides existence into two aspects, objective existence outside a mind,
and intentional existence which the mind creates for the abstracted essence
in order to know a thing.  There is a lot of evidence that intentional
existence, subjectivity, is bogus.  We have a direct experience of
evolution, a law of order in existence.  DQ is undefined.  Evolution to the
social level is a movement to consciousness, a self-aware being.  A level of
order though undefined is apprehended in undefined consciousness.  The
intellectual level evolves when two are in relationship, e.g., man/woman a
level of law.  Further evolution of consciousness only seems to have
occurred historically, enlightenment, heroes! etc.  MOQ meta-level?

Joe

On 5/12/08 9:25 AM, "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Greetings All!
> 
> Been thinking about patterns.  I have two questions for you:
> 
> 
> 1.  Do you know of anything, either conceptual or physical, that is
> not a pattern?
> 
> 2.  What is a pattern?
> 
> 
> Ron:
> If you do not mind my answering you inquiry, I will attempt to follow
> Pirsigs logic.
> 
> Patterns are experience. Patterns are Quality.
> 
> Experience is expressed intellectually per MoQ,
> As static experience or "SQ" and dynamic experience
> Or "DQ".
> 
> By understanding that this split is intellectual MoQ
> Solves the Mind/Matter paradox it does not exist
> In experience, it only exists intellectually.
> 
> By placing empirical certainty on pre-intellectual
> Experience, MoQ is more certain than objectivism
> Which places certainty in intellectualism.
> 
> By using DQ/SQ in lieu of S/O we are able to
> View reality as a whole in motion rather than
> A static solid state universe of objects in
> Space. (Hams negation and Bo's folly).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *********
> The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only
> the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony
> without end.
> 
>    
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/