[MD] chasing ghosts

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Mon May 12 16:30:01 PDT 2008


At 03:15 PM 5/12/2008, you wrote:


>SA previously:
> > >     Takes preconceptions and old tea-swishin' to
> > chase ghosts.  It's also called assuming without
> > dialogue.
>
>
>Marsha:
> > I seem to be in a 'denser than a door nail' mode.
> > I'm not sure what you're getting at.
>
>
>SA:  No... please ask, I've only recently stumbled
>upon this 'chasing ghosts' experience.  It started
>with Platt.  He kept sending me posts with quotes of
>Pirsig, from Lila I believe, and I had said I agreed
>with his post, but he kept sending me more and more.
>He was arguing against me still, but yet I had already
>agreed with him.  No matter what I sent back in
>response he would send another.  He was sending posts
>to me in his own world (and that's key to chasing
>ghosts).  No matter how I responded in agreement and
>then wonderment as to why he was continually sending
>me more posts trying to argue his position - he was
>arguing not against me anymore - then WHO?  A ghost I
>would say.  Then long after Platt noticed I agreed
>with him way back in his first post on the topic, here
>comes Bo lagging behind and responding to Platt with
>an off-the-wall answer that had nothing to do with the
>discussion between Platt and I - for Platt and I had
>agreed from the beginning, so, with Bo's response that
>went on about something that had nothing to do with
>Platt's and mine discussion, then Bo was arguing
>against - WHO?  A ghost I would say.
>      These ghosts we all chase from time to time are
>premeditated, preconceptual, sometimes these ghosts we
>lash out against are hidden behind our words, we're
>mad about something else that has nothing to do with
>the current topic so we find a way to fit in our
>off-topic disgust and it comes across very skewd.
>       At work, which is probably were I picked up the
>phrase 'chasing ghosts' for it comes up every once in
>awhile, and this concept at work fits in very well
>here.  When we're trying to find an item in the store,
>sometimes a shelf that is supposed to have product on
>it somewhere in the store, a clue comes through the
>system.  Whether it's from our item counts in what we
>are supposed to have in the store or an update in
>revising a shelf, but then when we go looking for the
>shelf or item this memo or note coming from a computer
>system is the only clue we have.  Everything else we
>are checking is a dead end, and nothing in the store
>is showing that this shelf or item even exists.
>Eventually what will happen, which I had to do the
>other day, is to search out various places in the
>store that the item and shelf could be.  Upon my
>second optional location I found what area it might be
>in, but then upon asking the person that works in that
>area they let me know that the shelf and items never
>were set-up in the store in the first place so
>revising them couldn't happen.
>      Well, to make a long story short, about half-way
>through this process of searching for the shelf and
>items somebody said to me, "Then again you might be
>chasing a ghost.  For that happens from time to time
>in this store."  Sure enough I was chasing a ghost.  I
>was chasing something that all this information that I
>was relying upon to build this picture was
>preconceptual and full of assumptions based on past
>experiences (due to little information would lead to
>these shelves and items being in the store, they just
>fell off the grid for some reason items will be in the
>store for so long that they fall off the grid, the
>system thinks they are not there anymore, but they
>are), but this time the shelf and item was not there -
>I spent about a half-hour talking about something and
>looking for something (doing all this planning and
>stuff) for something that wasn't even here - wasn't
>even happening.
>     That's what I find Bo and Platt did.  They
>searched and said some things about something that
>wasn't even happening.  They were chasing ghosts.
>      Sometimes chasing ghosts, not to point out Bo and
>Platt only, can be when somebody thinks your in a bad
>mood and you know your not - what ghost are they
>chasing?
>      Also, when people are talking past each other,
>this is another example of chasing ghosts.  When you
>think I'm saying this, but really I'm not, yet, I am
>saying that, but somebody insists you are saying this,
>that's chasing a ghost, too.  Ham does this often.  He
>can't think outside his little safety net so he sees
>ghosts a lot, and says people are saying this and that
>when they really aren't.
>
>
>the netherworld,
>SA
>


Greetings SA,

Ghosts are cool.  We all have them.  It's okay if one realizes 
they're just ghosts.  I think they come from the land of a thousand 
dances.  There's sometimes trouble when one thinks they're too 
real.  But mistaken identity occasionally happens to everybody.

Marsha










Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...  




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list