[MD] Truth and the Linguistic Turn

Platt Holden pholden at davtv.com
Tue May 13 15:52:07 PDT 2008


> > [Krimel]
> > Exactly, this odd notion of a fixed, absolute, perfect point of view is
> > the dream the drives folks like Ham. You seem to be in accord that
> > philosophers are on board rationally with what the sciences have
> > demonstrated empirically. There is no fixed absolute reference point.
> > There is no Absolute Truth beyond the conception of Absolute Truth. We can
> 
> > imagine such a thing. We can give it a "tip of the hat or a wag of the
> > finger" But we have no way of being certain that what we tip and wag at,
> > is what we think it is. 
> 
> [Platt]
> I presume you invoke an Absolute Truth in asserting "There is no Absolute
> Truth." Of course, if true the statement is self-contradictory. If not, it
> is a relative truth which may or may not be true, depending on your point of
> view
> 
> (or your culture if you are a postmodernist). Either way, the statement is
> doubtful.
> 
> [Krimel]
> No you are completely missing the point. Whether or not there is an Absolute
> Truth is irrelevant. I am willing to grant the conceptual possibility as is
> Matt, I believe. The point is justifying belief in an Absolute Truth. How
> could you achieve Absolute Certainty that you have a correct belief in such
> a Truth and that your belief is correct. I am saying that you could not be
> Absolutely Certain that your belief is Absolutely Justified even if Truth
> were Absolute. I am maintaining that both Truth and Justification are merely
> adjectives that describe beliefs.

And I am saying that whenever you assert a truth such as "both Truth and 
Justification are merely adjectives that describe beliefs" you assert an 
absolute Truth. If not, it's a relative truth which I can take or leave as 
I wish. In this case, I leave it.   

> If you would get a handle on this you might stop embarrassing yourself with
> this inane paradox talk you keep bringing up.

Always when you lose an argument comes the personal insult. I'm just 
surprised it hasn't come long before this. 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list